Legal Opinion
Crowell v. Crowell
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
The defendant, before answering, moves under subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The action is brought to set aside a separation agreement between the parties executed on March 18, 1927, a copy of which is attached to the complaint. The plaintiff in her complaint asks that said separation agreement and all other instruments executed by plaintiff in pursuance of the terms of said agreement be canceled and set aside and for other specified relief. The sole ground upon which the relief is asked for in the complaint is that " the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hungerford v. . HungerfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Harding v. . HardingNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Harding v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Cain v. CainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Riemer v. RiemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- DeRobertis v. DeRobertisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Crowell v. CrowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Satenstein v. SatensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.