Shirley M. Russell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company and Consumers Public Power District

I regret to have to dissent from the court’s decision, but I am unable to satisfy myself that the trial court’s determination of the question of Nebraska law involved is entitled to be held to be clearly erroneous.

I may state my agreement that the view which the court feels should have *682been taken on the amendment question represents the more salutary and the majority rule, as a legal principle. I further would agree that, in actions other than ones under the wrongful death statute, the Nebraska courts are entitled to be regarded as being liberal in allowing amendments as to party plaintiffs…