Legal Opinion

Castro v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1894No. 15,029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; William T. Wallace, Judge. Action by one Castro and others against the city and county of San Francisco, one Barkley and others. From an order dismissing the action on motion of defendant Barkley, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action against the city and county of San Francisco and a large number of individuals to declare that the city and county of San Francisco, and those claiming under it, are trustees of the plaintiffs as to the property described in the complaint, and for an accounting of the rents, issues and profits of the same. The appeal is from an order of the superior court dismissing the action. The ground of the motion for a dismissal was want of ordinary diligence in prosecuting the action. The affidavit of the defendant Barkley showed that the action was commenced on the nineteenth day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kreiss v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Murray v. GleesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API