State v. Erwin
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted by the verdict of a jury of the possession of marijuana which assessed his punishment at six months in the County Jail. The claims for reversal on this appeal are that the search of the kitchen and other rooms of the house where appellant was arrested was unreasonable and in violation of his constitutional rights, and any evidence obtained thereby was inadmissible under Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685; and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction because, as argued, the evidence merely showed…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. VirdureSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. WorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.