Legal Opinion
SD Voice v. Noem
United States District Court
Decided May 9, 2019No. 1:19-CV-01003-CBK; 3:19-CV-03010-CBKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES B. KORNMANN, United States District Judge *944Plaintiffs in these two cases filed complaints seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction preventing the State of South Dakota from enforcing Initiated Measure 241 ("IM 24"), which was enacted by the South Dakota voters in the 2018 general election. IM 24 bans out-of-state contributions to South Dakota ballot question committees. Plaintiffs assert that IM 24 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The trial on the merits was advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Institute for Free Speech v. JackleyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- League of Women Voters of South Dakota v. NoemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Smith v. HelzerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022