Reggio v. Day
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Exceptions from the District Court, Emery, J. The question is upon the liability of Jones & Hammond to be charged as trustees. The case was heard upon their disclosure. They disclosed, that for various indebtments of the principal defendants to them, and for various liabilities entered into by them for the principal defendants, they, the principal defendants, made to the trustees three mortgages of personal property which were duly recorded.
Read the full summary
On Exceptions from the District Court, Emery, J. The question is upon the liability of Jones & Hammond to be charged as trustees. The case was heard upon their disclosure. They disclosed, that for various indebtments of the principal defendants to them, and for various liabilities entered into by them for the principal defendants, they, the principal defendants, made to the trustees three mortgages of personal property which were duly recorded. Of one of the mortgages, dated Oct. 11, 1851, a copy was annexed to the disclosure. Among the liabilities which the trustees had entered into for the…
1Opinion of the CourtTenney, J.
— The supposed trustees were the creditors oí the principal defendants; and were also holden for them, *316as accommodation indorsers; and as collateral security took a mortgage of personal property on January 17, 1851; another mortgage on Oct. 17, 1851, and a third on Nov. 10, 1851, all of which were duly recorded. In the mortgage dated Oct. 17, 1851, among the liabilities of the trustees, therein referred to, was a note of the principal defendants to the plaintiff, corresponding in description, to the one in suit. It appears from the disclosure, that this note was inserted in the mortgage by…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Conine v. J. B. R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1866
- Conine v. Junction & Breakwater RailroadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1866