Ducey v. Peterson

In a bill for partition filed in the circuit court of Pike county by L. F. Ducey and James A. Ducey, the defendants in error, it was alleged that said James A. Ducey was the owner in fee simple of an undivided one-eighth of the premises sought to be partitioned; that Albert Peterson, one of the defendants to the bill, who is the plaintiff in error here, claimed to be the owner of said undivided one-eighth interest, but that the said Albert Peterson has no right, title or interest in the premises or any part thereof. Peterson answered the bill, claiming to be the owner in fee of the undivided…