Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Zirkel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1993No. 48S05-9305-CV-518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CIVIL PETITION TO TRANSFER

GIVAN, Justice.

The appellees brought an action against appellant for damages under Ind.Code § 24-5-13-1 et seq., commonly known as the Indiana "Lemon Law." In 1988, appel-lees purchased a new Cadillac Seville from Ed Martin Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc., an authorized General Motors dealer. From the date of purchase, August 22, 1988, through February of 1989, the Zirkels returned the car to Ed Martin at least twenty times because of their dissatisfaction with the brakes.

Invoices show that the brakes were repaired on September 28, 1988 and on October 12, 1988. Each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sothoron v. WestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Garmo v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Hackett v. PerronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Buchonok v. EmerickIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. General Motors Corp. v. ZirkelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gliottone v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  2. General Motors Corp. v. ZirkelIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Metro Health Professionals, Inc. v. Chrysler, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API