SafetyNet Youth Systems, LLC v. Guarantee Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
First, I question the significance of the main opinion’s quotations from Ex parte Windom, 840 So.2d 885, 889 n. 2 (Ala.2002), and Ex parte Pikeville Country Club, 844 So.2d 1186, 1188-89 (Ala.2002), insofar as those cases discuss the meaning of the term “injury” in venue cases applying the predecessor of current § 6-3-7(a)(1), Ala Code 1975. That term no longer is found in § 6-3-7(a)(l). See Act 99-249, Ala. Acts.1999.
Further, those cases are quoted as part of two separate discussions of the proper venue of the various tort claims asserted by SafetyNet Youth Systems,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte Pikeville Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Suzuki Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Siniard v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Maddox v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.