Legal Opinion
Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. Enoe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Martin Enoe in an underlying personal injury action entitled Dixon v Enoe, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 27510/09, the defendant Martin Enoe appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 10, 2011, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify him in the underlying personal injury action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- First Financial Insurance v. Jetco Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Magistro v. Buttered Bagel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Farmbrew Realty Corp. v. Tower InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.