I-Flow Corp. v. Apex Medical Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION [Doc. No. 49]
NITA L. STORMES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned matter is Plaintiff I-Flow Corporation’s (“I-Flow”) Motion to Compel Document Production pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3.4(a) [Doc. No. 49]. I-Flow contends that Defendants Apex Medical Technologies, Inc. and Mark McGlothlin (collectively “Apex”) have failed to produce documents that fully detail the operation and structure of the accused device in this litigation. Apex opposes I-Flow’s motion [Doe. No. 57], arguing that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKesson Information Solutions LLC v. Epic Systems Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007