Legal Opinion

Hoag v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1999No. 99-01556Published

1Per curiam

Cindy Hoffman Hoag appeals the summary denial of her request for jail credit, which the trial court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because her motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hoag’s ability to file a proper *349rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which alleges that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Crompton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Spivey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API