Legal Opinion
Scarola v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 2017No. 2888 652705/15PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered May 26, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the cause of action under General Business Law § 349, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
The complaint fails to allege any of the three elements of a claim under General Business Law § 349 (see Stutman v Chemical Bank, 95 NY2d 24, 29 [2000]). First, the challenged conduct, i.e., defendant’s continuing to bill plaintiff for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cruz v. NYNEX Information ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Camacho v. IO Practiceware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Golub v. Tanenbaum-Harber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jakes-Johnson v. GottliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Manchanda v. Educational Credit Management CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Spec Simple, Inc. v. Designer Pages Online LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2017
- Villalba v. Houslanger & Associates, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022