Legal Opinion

In Re Crow-Billingsley Air Park, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2003No. 02-0311PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

The relators in this original proceeding, Crow-Billingsley Air Park, Ltd., Crow-Billingsley Berkeley, Ltd., Henry Billings-ley, and Lucy Crow-Billingsley (collectively “Billingsley”), seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to enforce its final judgment in the underlying case involving a disputed zoning committee election. Because the trial court abused its discretion by failing to enforce its unsuperseded final judgment, we conditionally grant the writ.

Air Parks Estates is a residential and commercial subdivision subject to certain restrictive covenants. These covenants established…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gonzales v. Daniel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. In Re SheshtawyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Air Park-Dallas Zoning Committee v. Crow-Billingsley Airpark, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  4. Sanders v. Blockbuster, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Kennedy v. Hudnall, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API