Kloster Cruise, Ltd. v. Rentz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Assuming for present purposes that the weather data from the National Climatic Data Center were not independently admissible,* the trial court acted within its discretion in allowing the expert on direct examination to present the data as the basis for his expert opinion. That is. so because the underlying data was the beginning point for analysis, but some further analysis was required by the expert in order to apply the data to the harbor at Philipsburg, St. Maarten. See Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, Co., 429 So.2d 1216, 1222-23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Michael H. Graham and Robert S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Riggins v. Mariner Boat Works, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Maklakiewicz v. BertonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Department of Corrections v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Gerber v. IyengarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.J. v. Agency for Persons with DisabilitiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Linn v. FossumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004