Legal Opinion
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 8, 1982No. 384-78PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge
This case is a sequel to Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 240, 624 F.2d 1005 (1980) ("Alyeska P’). There we held that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover fees paid to reimburse the government for its expenses in processing the plaintiffs’ application for a permit to construct the trans-Alaska oil pipeline. The primary ground of our decision was that the governing legislation authorized the Secretary of the Interior to obtain such reimbursement only if he acted pursuant to an authorizing regulation, and that since he had not promulgated such a regulation until…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Container Transport International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Everett Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- The Young Engineers, Inc., (Aka Tye or Tye, Inc.,) v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Joseph F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Mars Incorporated v. Nippon Conlux Kabushiki-Kaisha, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Shelkofsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.