Legal Opinion

Joseph Barsuk, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, cross motion granted and counterclaims dismissed. Same Memorandum as in Joseph Barsuk, Inc. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (281 AD2d 875 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Kehoe, J., who dissents in part and votes to modify in the following Memorandum:

Kehoe, J. (dissenting in part). I respectfully dissent in part. I agree with the majority that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment on the counterclaim for breach of contract. I disagree, however, with the majority that the counterclaims asserted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coleman, Grasso & Zasada Appraisals, Inc. v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Jones v. GellesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Joseph Barsuk, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Stock Exchange, LLC v. Mopex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API