Mechanics Traders' Nat. B'k v. . Crow
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, on production of the note and proving the indorsement of the payees, was prima facie entitled to recover.
The defendant gave evidence tending to show that he signed the note at the request of Nelson, one of the payees, upon his promise to give the defendant in exchange his note indorsed by his father for the same amount, and upon the further engagement to procure the note to be discounted, and to pay the defendant from the proceeds $1,800, on a debt owing by him to the defendant. The defendant testified that neither the note or money had been given him. The jury would have been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by21 opinions
- Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Ph&338nix Insurance Company v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Harger v. . WorrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Hill v. DillonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.