Legal Opinion

Denslow v. Bush

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided July 2, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Van Burén Denslow against Sazah M. Bush and others. Prom an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The special term judge made an order sustaining the demurrer interposed to the complaint, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. No interlocutory or final judgment has been entered. The appeal is from the order only, and such an appeal will not lie. Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514; Whitman v. Nichols, 16 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 329; Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & S. F. Co., 16 Hun, 484; Gamer v. Harmony Mills, 6 Abb. N. C. 212, 45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 148; Bell v. Sun Co., 1 N. Y. Law Bui. 29; Trust Co. v. Pratt, 25 Hun, 23,-—and similar cases. For these reasons, the appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cambridge Valley National Bank v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Garner v. ThornThe Superior Court of New York City · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludwig v. GoveCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API