Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell Linney

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2016No. 14-4847PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge KEENAN joined..

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

In this case we must determine whether two burglaries that served as part of the predicate for Russell Linney’s Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) sentencing enhancement occurred on different occasions. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). ' The district court ruled that the burglaries did in fact occur on different occasions. We now affirm.

I

On August 8-9, 2013, Linney and two companions engaged in a crime spree that started with a pair of burglaries and ended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. Vincent Jay LetterloughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Sherwin ArchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Marcel Aparicio-SoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. HarcumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Benton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Linney v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. United States v. Antoine ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Jamaal CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Kimjuan Ellis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API