Legal Opinion

Fogle v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover for loss and damage by fire, based upon an alleged contract of fire insurance. Plaintiff, Fogle, suing as assignee of the insured, Charles E. and Minnie A. Harding, husband and wife, owners of the burned property, recovered judgment for $3175.32. Appeal was granted defendant to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, where, on a rehearing, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded, but by a divided court, one judge dissenting. On request of the dissenting judge the cause was certified to this court, pursuant to constitutional mandate, and is here for determination on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Baile v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Vining v. Franklin Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Duff v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Preisler v. CalcaterraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Pape v. Mid-America Preferred, Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Robards v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Russell v. Reliance Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API