Daniel v. State

Carley, Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of burglary. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on the jury verdict. Appellant’s sole enumeration of error is the admission of his in-custody inculpatory statement.

A Jackson v. Denno hearing was conducted to determine the admissibility of appellant’s statement. At the hearing, the deputy sheriff testified that appellant had not been read his Miranda rights, but had merely been given a copy of the standard form containing those rights. However, allowing appellant “to read rights printed on a form…