Legal Opinion

Advanced Masonry Systems v. Molina

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 2009No. 1D07-6540Published

1Per curiam

The Employer/Carrier (E/C) challenge the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC) finding that Claimant was entitled to permanent total disability (PTD) benefits and PTD supplemental benefits. Because the JCC’s finding that Claimant was PTD is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, we reverse. Our resolution as to the PTD claim renders the E/C’s challenge to the award of PTD supplemental benefits moot.

Background

Claimant, a mason, fell and hurt his low back in the course and scope of his employment on October 8, 2001. Claimant received physical therapy and injections from October 2001…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Osceola County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Home Depot v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. US Fidelity & Guar. Ass'n v. KempDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Neavins v. City of St. PetersburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Olavarria v. Okeelanta Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API