Hummel v. New York Central Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
The appellant brought this action against the appellees to recover for the alleged wrongful death of one Samuel U. Hummel. The appellant introduced her evidence and rested. The appellees thereupon rested ■without offering evidence. On their motion the court directed a verdict in favor of appellees (defendants) and the correctness of that ruling is challenged here.
The evidence discloses that at a point in Vigo County where the appellee company’s double track railroad ran in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction, it was intersected by a public highway known as the Haythorne Road, which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Snider v. TruexIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Hirst v. Chevrolet Muncie Division of General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mamula v. Ford Motor CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kraus v. KRAUS, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Phares v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Holtz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.