United States Cordage Co. v. William Wall's Sons Rope Co.
New York Supreme Court
.Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the United States Cordage Cotnpany against the William Wall’s Sons Rope Company and others to enjoin the defendants from using the name of William Wall’s Sons separately or conjunctively with other words. From an order granting an injunction pendente lite, defendants appeal. Modified.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The order under review enjoins the defendants, during the pendency of this action, "from using or displaying the name ‘William Wall’s Sons,’ either separately or conjunctively with any other words, and from using the name ‘William Wall’s Sons Rope Company,’ or either of such names, upon any signs, cards, bill heads, or letter heads, or otherwise, or from any way holding themselves out as successors to the firm of William Wall’s Sons, and from in any manner soliciting business from the customers formerly of William Wall’s Sons.” In support of the motion for an injunction pendente lite the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Marcus Ward & Co. v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bancroft v. Union Embossing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Smith v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Ru Ton v. EverittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Ru Ton v. EverittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898