Legal Opinion

State v. O'CONNOR

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1976No. 764SC444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues on appeal that the order revoking his probation should be reversed because defendant was not accorded a preliminary hearing at the time of, or near the time of, his arrest. Defendant relies upon Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 33 L.Ed. 2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593 (1972), and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 36 L.Ed. 2d 656, 93 S.Ct. 1756 (1973).

Morrissey v. Brewer, supra, mandated both a preliminary and final revocation hearing in parole revocation proceedings. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, applied the same reasoning in probation and suspended sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Stewart-MeyersIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API