Legal Opinion

Katebi v. Fink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered March 22, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*425While “[a] claim for legal malpractice is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1990]), here, the complaint is contradicted by the evidentiary material submitted on the motion to dismiss (see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Bernstein v. Oppenheim & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Schloss v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Weissman v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Schloss v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API