People v. Bord
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjexam.
Under a statute which declares intermarriage between persons related within the prohibited degrees to be incest it has been held that the offense becomes complete upon intermarriage and that to sustain a conviction it is not necessary to establish carnal knowledge. Such statutes are common. “ It is entirely competent for the Legislature, upon declaring an act to be a crime, to designate it by any term that may be chosen for that purpose.” Intermarriage is the act of marrying. (State v. Schaunhurst, 34 Iowa, 547; Hintz v. State, 58 Wis. 493.)
The provision in the Domestic Relations…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hintz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- State v. SchaunhurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. EboliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People v. LubowNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.