Legal Opinion

People v. Bord

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjexam.

Under a statute which declares intermarriage between persons related within the prohibited degrees to be incest it has been held that the offense becomes complete upon intermarriage and that to sustain a conviction it is not necessary to establish carnal knowledge. Such statutes are common. “ It is entirely competent for the Legislature, upon declaring an act to be a crime, to designate it by any term that may be chosen for that purpose.” Intermarriage is the act of marrying. (State v. Schaunhurst, 34 Iowa, 547; Hintz v. State, 58 Wis. 493.)

The provision in the Domestic Relations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hintz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. SchaunhurstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. EboliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. People v. LubowNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API