Panhorst v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
I
On May 10, 1993, the Director of Revenue (Director) sent a letter to Evalyn Panhorst stating she was required to take a driving skills test pursuant to section 302.291, RSMo Supp.1989. The letter threatened that she must take the skills test by June 9 or her driving privileges would be revoked. Not only did Panhorst refuse to take the test by June 9, but she again refused to take the test when the deadline was extended until July 25. Instead, on July 9,1993, Panhorst filed a petition for review naming “Department of Revenue, State of Missouri,” in the caption and ordering that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sellenriek v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Jackson v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Silman v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kellison v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Zwyers v. Director of Revenue, StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Roberts v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lucy v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.