Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chamberlain v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1924Published

1DissentMcLaughlin, J.

I dissent. The only fair inference which I think can be drawn from the evidence, giving the plaintiff the most favorable view of it, is that the intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.

The accident occurred a few minutes after 12 o’clock noon. Had the intestate looked when about one hundred feet from the crossing he could have seen the train as it came from behind the red barn, which was about six hundred feet from the crossing. Had he looked at any time after the train passed that point until it reached the crossing, he could have seen it. It was a clear day. There…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. . Fonda, Johnstown and Gloversville Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Cassidy v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Castle v. . Director-General of RailroadsNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Barnasky v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Bowden v. . Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API