Legal Opinion

Kipling v. City of White Plains

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 2001No. 1999-CA-002180-MRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GUIDUGLI, Judge.

Earl C. Kipling and Mary Kipling (the Kiplings) appeal from various orders of the Hopkins Circuit Court which granted an easement across their farm to the City of White Plains (the City) for the purpose of installing a water line. We affirm.

Due to the adverse effects of strip mining operations in Southern Hopkins County some twenty years ago, nineteen households in the Mount Carmel area of the *778county lost their water supply. The Kentucky Division of Abandoned Mine Lands (AML) studied the situation and set aside $350,000 in funds to replace the water supply to these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Withers v. University of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Flying J Travel Plaza v. Commonwealth, Transportation Cabinet, Department of HighwaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Day v. DayKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Owensboro v. McCormickKentucky Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API