Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Martin v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1918No. 14658Published

Application for a writ of mandamus, filed in the supreme court January 28, 1918.

1DissentMount, J.

(dissenting)—I cannot agree that this is a case for the issuance of the writ of mandate. Our statute provides, at Rem. Code, § 1011, that the writ,

“may be issued by any court, except a justice’s or a police court, to any inferior tribunal, ... to com*96pel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust or station, . ”

and, at § 1015:

“The writ must be issued in all cases where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. ’ ’

This court, in State ex rel. Miller v. Superior Court, 40 Wash. 555, 82 Pac. 875, 111…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Townsend Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Carrau v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API