Legal Opinion · Dissent
State ex rel. Martin v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1918No. 14658Published
Application for a writ of mandamus, filed in the supreme court January 28, 1918.
1DissentMount, J.
(dissenting)—I cannot agree that this is a case for the issuance of the writ of mandate. Our statute provides, at Rem. Code, § 1011, that the writ,
“may be issued by any court, except a justice’s or a police court, to any inferior tribunal, ... to com*96pel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust or station, . ”
and, at § 1015:
“The writ must be issued in all cases where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. ’ ’
This court, in State ex rel. Miller v. Superior Court, 40 Wash. 555, 82 Pac. 875, 111…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Townsend Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Carrau v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.