Legal Opinion

Hames v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Rockwall County. Tried below before Hon. F. L. Hawkins.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted May 14, 1906, by Elizabeth Hames and her seven children, two of whom were minors, against L. D. Stroud and M. S. Bailey. The nature of the suit was to set aside a certain conveyance for fraud, and to recover 124 acres of land, alleging, in substance, that L. D. Stroud, the attorney for appellants, had, as such attorney, gained their confidence, and had thereby fraudulently overreached them in his dealings "with them. Answers were filed, and upon a hearing the court instructed a verdict for defendants, and judgment was rendered accordingly, from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. McCartneyTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Henry v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. La Fleaur v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Parker v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Grant v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API