Legal Opinion
Austin v. UMPAC/MHEAA (In Re Austin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 10, 2003No. 19-30289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT G. MAYER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion of three governmental entities— two of which are not parties to this adver- . sary proceeding — seeking to be dismissed as parties defendant. The State of Michigan, the Michigan Guaranty Agency (“MGA”) and the Michigan Higher Education Assistance Authority (“MHEAA”) seek dismissal of this proceeding as to them. All assert that this court lacks .jurisdiction over them because they are entitled to sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Only MHEAA is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Rickey L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Garmhausen v. Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. (In Re Garmhausen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Pritzl v. Citibank (N.Y. State), N.A. (In Re Pritzl)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Educational Credit Management Corp. v. PulleyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Wedell v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In re Wedell)District Court, W.D. Washington · 2005