Cook v. Pearce
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
The appellant brings up for review a decree in equity compelling specific performance of a contract by him to purchase land of the appellees. And the questions argued are: Whether there was a written, signed agreement, memorandum or note as required by the Statute of Frauds (Stat. 29 Car. II, c. 3, sec. 4); whether a description given in a writing, of the land concerned, was sufficiently certain to permit enforcement; whether mistake of the purchaser should prevent enforcement; and whether the contract was made on Sunday and was because of" that fact unenforceable.
The sellers owned six acres…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- King v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Diffenderffer v. KnocheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Henneke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Higdon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufmann v. AdalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Patton v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Frey & Soy, Inc. v. MagnessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931