Legal Opinion

Cook v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 19, 1931No. [No. 5, January Term, 1931.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The appellant brings up for review a decree in equity compelling specific performance of a contract by him to purchase land of the appellees. And the questions argued are: Whether there was a written, signed agreement, memorandum or note as required by the Statute of Frauds (Stat. 29 Car. II, c. 3, sec. 4); whether a description given in a writing, of the land concerned, was sufficiently certain to permit enforcement; whether mistake of the purchaser should prevent enforcement; and whether the contract was made on Sunday and was because of" that fact unenforceable.

The sellers owned six acres…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. King v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Diffenderffer v. KnocheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Henneke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  5. Higdon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1827

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. AdalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Patton v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Frey & Soy, Inc. v. MagnessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API