Legal Opinion

Musto v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1937No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. On September 17, 1932, plaintiff resided near the tracks of defendant company in Pittston. About 11 a. m. on that date he was walking along a path eighteen inches wide on an alleged permissive right-of-way which led across the railroad. As the path neared the tracks there was a four-foot sloping bank. Plaintiff claims that when he was on this sloping bank, six feet away from the first rail (or four feet from the overhang of the train) and three or four feet above the level of the tracks, he saw a freight train…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ReillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Joyce v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Dorris v. Bridgman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Hawthorne v. Texas & N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Hanna v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Straight v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Parsons Et Vir v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Bowser Et Ux. v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Noonan Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Pieckowicz v. Oliver Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API