Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Dunn & Corey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 2000No. 3D99-2491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse the order appealed and remand this legal malpractice action to the trial court to permit the appellant to amend his complaint to allege that, as a member of a pre-paid legal services plan, he had not been in direct privity with the attorneys alleged to have committed the alleged malpractice. It appears that the trial court declined to permit the amendment, having concluded that the two-year professional malpractice limitations period of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991) had passed, thus plaintiffs proposed amendment would be futile. However, section 95.11(4)(a)1 excludes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Archey v. Government Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clements v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API