Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. Borum
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1922No. 11,255PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, C. J.
— This action was instituted by Borum to recover a commission alleged to be due him from Hutchinson for selling the latter’s real estate. The court made a general finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $240 and rendered judgment accordingly. The only error assigned which can be recognized is the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Borum is a real estate broker and he claims the right to recover a commission by virtue of the. following instrument in writing, prepared by Borum and signed by Hutchinson:
“Indianapolis, Indiana, Oct. 26, 1920.
“J. H. Borum, As Agent, City.
De…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Day v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978