Legal Opinion

Aloha Petroglyph, Inc. v. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1980No. 6570PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment in favor of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., the defendant below and against the plaintiffs below with respect to Counts I and IV of the Complaint. The appeal concerns only Count I which sounded in fraud.

The question raised is whether there can be a recovery of damages for fraud where appellant entered into a lease of certain shop premises with appellee relying on appellee’s “statements and representations, . . . that [it] . . . would actively seek and promote a special tourist package for the Maui Mall complex. ’ ’

Of course, on a motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  2. Stahl v. BalsaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Keller v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MurphyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Wolfer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Taylor v. Bartolucci, Jr.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
  4. Wolfer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API