Aloha Petroglyph, Inc. v. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.
This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment in favor of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., the defendant below and against the plaintiffs below with respect to Counts I and IV of the Complaint. The appeal concerns only Count I which sounded in fraud.
The question raised is whether there can be a recovery of damages for fraud where appellant entered into a lease of certain shop premises with appellee relying on appellee’s “statements and representations, . . . that [it] . . . would actively seek and promote a special tourist package for the Maui Mall complex. ’ ’
Of course, on a motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Stahl v. BalsaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Keller v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MurphyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wolfer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- Taylor v. Bartolucci, Jr.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Wolfer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982