Barrentine v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell. Joe Barrentine was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals. There is no error apparent of record except the judgment and sentence, and this court will correct that or remand for proper sentence. — Dar ring ton v. The State, 87 Ala, 1; Johnson v. The State, 94 Ala. 35; Dowling v. City of Troy, 56 South. 116.
1Opinion of the CourtPelham, J.
The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. The record contains no' bill of exceptions, and the certificate of the clerk shows that the time for filing has expired. The judgment of conviction and sentence imposing a fine of $75 is regular, *189and is based on a verdict finding tbe defendant gnilty and assessing a fine of that amount; but tbe judgment fails to show the amount of costs, or the number of days necessary for the defendant to perform hard labor for the county in default of paying or securing the costs, although the judgment entry shows the costs were not paid or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Herrington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Dowling v. City of TroyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tuggle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Loudermilk v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919