Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Foster

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1936No. 16373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

A rehearing was granted in these consolidated cases, limited, however, to the question of the quantum of damages awarded by us in our original opinion, see 169 So. 103, except that in the Andrews Case a rehearing was granted for the purpose of reconsidering the question of contributory negligence on the part of Neil Andrews.

A re-examination of the evidence concerning the contributory negligence of Neil Andrews convinces us that our former decree was correct and that Neil Andrews was not guilty of any fault in the premises.

Therefore, being of the opinion that the defendants are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. FosterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bertuccini v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Hansen v. AhsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Henry v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API