Legal Opinion

Estate of Temple v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 22, 1976No. Docket Nos. 727-72, 728-72Published

Held, the transcript of the testimony given by the taxpayer's accountant before a Federal grand jury is not qualified as an exception to the hearsay rule under rule 803(24) or 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and accordingly may not be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax liability of the taxpayer, where both the accountant and the taxpayer were deceased and therefore unavailable to testify at the trial, there was no…

Read the full summary

Held, the transcript of the testimony given by the taxpayer's accountant before a Federal grand jury is not qualified as an exception to the hearsay rule under rule 803(24) or 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and accordingly may not be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax liability of the taxpayer, where both the accountant and the taxpayer were deceased and therefore unavailable to testify at the trial, there was no cross-examination or opportunity for cross-examination of the accountant by the taxpayer or his representative, and, in view…

1Opinion of the Court

Estate of Hollis R. Temple, Deceased, Barbara Barnhill, Executrix, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Estate of Temple v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 727-72, 728-72

United States Tax Court

65 T.C. 776; 1976 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 173;

January 22, 1976, Filed

Held, the transcript of the testimony given by the taxpayer's accountant before a Federal grand jury is not qualified as an exception to the hearsay rule under rule 803(24) or 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and accordingly may not be received as substantive evidence in a subsequent civil action involving the tax…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API