Legal Opinion
City of Sunset Hills v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1999No. ED 75748PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., Presiding Judge.
Defendant, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., appeals from the judgment against it, entered in a court-tried case, in an action brought by plaintiff, City of Sunset Hills, for violating an ordinance requiring the payment of a business license fee. We affirm.
Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. (hereinafter Southwestern Bell) is a corporation engaged in providing cellular or wireless communication services by transmitting signals between antennae located at fixed sites within a service area and the mobile units used by its customers. The mobile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Austin, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
- Armco Steel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Knopke v. KnopkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Springfield v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- City of Jefferson City, Mo. v. Cingular WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Block Financial Corp. v. America Online, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Robertson Properties, Inc. v. Detachment of Territory From Public Water Supply District No. 8 of Clay CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Springfield v. Cingular WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.