Legal Opinion

Ruh v. Hawaii

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 9, 2016No. CIV. NO. 16-00034 LEK/RLPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the court is pro se petitioner Richard M. Ruh’s petition for writ of habe-*1269as corpus (“Petition”). Pet., Doc. No. 1. Petitioner challenges the Hawaii Paroling Authority’s (“HPA”) allegedly illegal calculation of his maximum consecutive terms after it revoked his parole in 2008, in State v. Ruh, Cr. No. 93-0173(2), and State v. Ruh, Cr. No. 94(0092(1).

The court ordered Respondent and Petitioner to address the procedural issues present in the Petition,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Burns v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
Ventrella v. WeadDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023