Legal Opinion

Hearell v. Illinois Central Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1919PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Crittenden Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Earnest Hearell, as administrator of the estate of Winstell Hearell, instituted this action against appellees, defendants below, to recover damages for the death of his intestate, a private in the national guard, and one of a squad of six assigned to guard a trestle about 2y2 miles north of Wickliffe, at what is known as Minor’s Slough. The track, for practically the entire distance from Wickliffe to this point, is on a fill from 15 to 30 feet high. On the night of May 19, 1917, decedent had the watch from 6 o’clock to midnight; a rifle and a lantern…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Louisville Gas Co. v. Kaufman, Straus & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Hughes v. Cincinnati, &c., RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. Sutton's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Stuart's Admr. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cash's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Campbell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. L. & N. Railroad v. Stidham's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stidham's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API