Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 23, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

On November 10, 1988, this court, by a majority opinion, found that the ruling of the trial court admitting into evidence the testimony of state's witnesses Martha Salter and Sally Ursury constituted reversible error. The decision was based on our finding that the information, which formed the basis of their testimony, was not obtained from the "victims' complaint" and, thus, constituted inadmissible hearsay. On petition of the state, the Alabama Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari directed to this court and, on December 28, 1989, reversed our…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Sasser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Inmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Sparrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API