Legal Opinion
Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Lozier
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided January 12, 1897No. 5,404PublishedCited by 4 opinions
This was a suit in equity by the Palmer'Pneumatic Tire Company against Henry A. Lozier to determine a question of interference between certain patents, both covering “a new and useful improvement in fabrics.”
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a bill filed under section 4918 of the lie vised Statutes. That section provides that:
“Whenever there are interfering patents, any person interested in any one of them, or in the working of the invention claimed under either of them, may have relief against (the interfering patentee, and all parties interested under him, by suit in equity against the owners of the interfering patent; and the court, on notice to the adverse parties, and other due proceedings had according to the course of equity, may adjudge and declare either of the patents void in whole or in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Leggett v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Fullerton Walnut Growers' Ass'n v. Anderson-Barngrover Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Corona Chemical Co. v. Latimer Chemical Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1916
- Murray v. The ChicagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894