Legal Opinion

Kneeland v. Shroyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1958PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action to recover a commission or finder’s fee based on a written agreement which called for payment to the plaintiff by the defendants, Greorge Shroyer and Kenneth O. Watkins, of $50,000. Under the terms of the agreement only a first payment of $25,000 was due at the time this action was commenced. Recovery of that amount was sought, and in a jury trial a verdict for the amount prayed for was returned against the defendant Shroyer. Watkins was exonerated. Shroyer (hereinafter referred to at times as the defendant) has appealed from the consequent judgment.

The agreement sued upon…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McClellan v. SanfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Flegel v. DowlingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Diamond v. JacquithArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Dant v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Willamette Quarries, Inc. v. WodtliOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kantor v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API