Legal Opinion

Harvey and Florence Pulvers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1969No. 22206PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Can taxpayers on their federal income tax return take a deduction for an “other casualty loss” when as a consequence of a nearby landslide that ruined three nearby homes, but did no physical damage to the property of taxpayers, with a resultant loss of value because of common fear the mountain might attack their resi dence and lot next? (There is yet no substantial impairment of ingress or egress on the street serving their home.) We agree with the tax court that they cannot.

Sec. 165, Internal Revenue Code of 1954 1 , so far as pertinent provides:

“Sec. 165. Losses.(a)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. The Citizens Bank of Weston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Charles W. P. Kamanski and Robin Kamanski v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Keith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. William C. Dosher v. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Kamanski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Cox v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API