Mazade v. Justice's Court of Goldfield Township
Nevada Supreme Court
Certiorari by Louis Mazade to review a judgment of the Justice’s Court of Goldfield Township, Esmeralda County, in an action by M. C. Peterman against Louis Mazade. From the judgment of the district court dismissing the writ of certiorari and order on motion for new trial adhering to the former ruling, Mazade appeals, and defendant moves to dismiss the appeal. The appeal should be dismissed.
Read the full summary
Certiorari by Louis Mazade to review a judgment of the Justice’s Court of Goldfield Township, Esmeralda County, in an action by M. C. Peterman against Louis Mazade. From the judgment of the district court dismissing the writ of certiorari and order on motion for new trial adhering to the former ruling, Mazade appeals, and defendant moves to dismiss the appeal. The appeal should be dismissed. The supreme court has no jurisdiction to hear or determine the appeal, for the reason (a) that no notice of appeal was ever filed or served upon respondent, and (b) no appeal was ever taken or perfected…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
McCarran, C. J.:
An action was commenced in the justice court of Goldfield township in which one M. C. Peterman was plaintiff and Louis Mazade was defendant. Judgment was entered against defendant in that court and he sued out a writ of certiorari in the district court. The proceedings in the district court were all had under the entitlement, “Louis Mazade v. Justice’s Court of Goldfield Township, in the County of Esmeralda, State of Nevada, and Marvin Arnold, Justice of the Peace of said Justice’s Court.”
In the district court the writ of certiorari.was dismissed. On motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leonard v. PeacockNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Bancroft v. Pike ex rel. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Shute v. Big Meadow Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandstrom v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2005